The overall aim of this study is to determine the degree of realization as well as examining its enforcers and inhibitors which are in the form of social, economic and physical objectives. The theoretical framework and research hypotheses require that the field research should be applied for collecting and analyzing the data. Data collection was performed through visiting organizations, individuals and distribution of questionnaires. The statistical universe of the research included all residents and shopkeepers based in the central texture of the town of Kermanshah. According to the census undertaken in 2006, the population based in the central texture of the town of Kermanshah was approximately 16000 and 480 were chosen to be studied through simple random sampling and the sampling tables of Kregcie & Morgan. In the present study, the simulative and criterion credibilities were utilized to assess the validity of the research and in addition, the factor analysis was used to assess the structure credibility and more to the point, The Cronbach Alpha was used to obtain the reliability of the research tool. The data were analyzed through the indices of descriptive statistics, crisscross tables, correlation coefficients and variance analysis. Therefore, all of the variables were described in the form of frequency distribution tables by the indices of descriptive statistics and crisscross tables of the statistical samples. Also, as for analyzing the relations of independent and dependent variables, variance analysis, F test and Pearson Correlation Test were applied. Based on the first hypothesis, the research states that,” It seems that the reformation and reconstruction plan of the central texture of the town of Kermanshah has not been capable of achieving its objectives and anticipations”, which has been verified in six stages of studying. Therefore, the first main hypothesis was supported (HO). Eventually, both hypotheses were supported and their sub hypotheses were supported, too. As for the reasons for the lack of success of the plan, such items as a lack of favorable political conditions, lack of managers and urban authorities’ trust in participation, imposing the opinions of individuals, time, energy and capital shortages, lack of interest in participation on the part of interfering institutions, lack of establishment of participation and lack of trustees can be named.